US 5G Mobile Proxies in United States

How 5G is different from our 4G pool

For most US targets, not very. Both 4G and 5G exit through the same carrier ASNs (T-Mobile AS21928, Verizon AS22394, AT&T AS20057) and share the same CGNAT trust properties. A site that fingerprints ASN doesn't distinguish 4G from 5G at all.

Where it matters:

1. Latency. T-Mobile standalone 5G measures 30–60ms to major US ad-tech edges — roughly half the RTT of LTE on the same carrier. If your automation is ladder-timed (sneaker queues, ad auction bids, live-inventory checks), the extra 50ms compounds.
2. IPv6 reachability. T-Mobile US is IPv6-first; their 5G SA core assigns IPv6 by default and falls back to IPv4 via 464XLAT. A growing class of US sites (Cloudflare-fronted retail, Google-hosted APIs) now accept and prefer IPv6 from mobile origins. If your target does, 5G gives you a path that 4G cannot.
3. Honeymoon scoring. Bot-detection vendors train on observed traffic. 5G SA traffic is still rare enough in their training sets that it defaults to "probably a real user" scoring. That margin shrinks every quarter; we don't promise it's durable.

Where we have US 5G capacity

5G SA is not yet everywhere. Our active markets, April 2026:

• T-Mobile SA — New York, Los Angeles, Chicago, Dallas, Atlanta, Miami, Seattle, Denver.
• Verizon NSA + SA rollout — NYC, LA, Chicago, Boston; SA is expanding but not stable enough yet for production rotation outside those four.
• AT&T NSA — Dallas, Houston, Austin, LA. AT&T's standalone 5G timeline in 2026 is slower than the other two — NSA is what you'll get outside Texas.

When 5G is worth the upgrade

Pay for 5G when you need either native IPv6, or sub-50ms US latency that 4G can't deliver. For plain "I want a US mobile carrier exit" — 4G on the same ASN is identical on trust signal and costs less.